SMHC Releases Reports Detailing Progress and Pitfalls in Developing Effective Educators

SMHC today, at a press conference led by Governor Pawlenty and former Governor Hunt, released a series of case studies on five top-performing districts, one state and three organizations. The SMHC Case Studies assess progress on teacher and principal recruitment, selection, and placement; induction and mentoring; professional development; performance management (evaluation); and compensation, and chronicle: Boston,  Chicago,  Fairfax County,  Long Beach, New York, Minnesota’s Q Comp program, Teach For America, New Leaders for New Schools and The New Teacher Project.  The findings from the cases show that the five districts have made significant progress on recruiting to start the school year with virtually no vacancies.  Yet there is still work to be done on continuing to develop teachers to be effective educators.  All the cases can be found in the resource section of this Web site.  Let us know your thoughts about the cases by leaving a comment on this blog.

SMHC Task Force Member Beverly Hall Featured in Education Week

This long article in Education Week profiles SMHC Task Force member Beverly Hall, who is superintendent of the Atlanta Public Schools.  The article describes both the overall education improvement strategy Hall implemented and many of her talent and human capital management practices as well.  Moreover, her initiatives have worked!  Atlanta student performance has increased dramatically and is at their highest levels in years.  The article, like the SMHC cases that will be released on November 18, 2008, again show that one correlate to progress in urban districts is long term stable leadership.

Wanted: Good Teachers. A Center for Public Education Report.

The National School Board Association and its Center for Public Education endorses the importance of school board initiatives to recruit and develop strong teachers as the core of the instructional program of public school districts.

New Leaders for New Schools

Guest post from LaVerne Srinivasan, President, New Leaders for New Schools; SMHC Task Force Member; and Presenter at First SMHC Task Force meeting.

Since its inception in 2000, New Leaders for New Schools has attracted, prepared, and supported outstanding individuals to become the next generation of school leaders in response to the immense need for exceptional principals in our nation’s urban public schools.

We began with a first cohort of 15 individuals in New York City and Chicago in 2001. Since then, we have built a national community of more than 560 outstanding school leaders in 9 urban centers, including California’s Bay Area, Baltimore, Chicago, Memphis, Milwaukee, New Orleans, New York City, Prince George’s County, MD, and Washington, D.C.

New Leaders’ program model is premised on the belief that strong school leadership is a critical component of success, and our definition of success (and ultimate accountability) is defined as student achievement outcomes where 90+ percentage of students in a school are reaching proficiency and are prepared for college, careers, and citizenship.

New Leaders recruits and trains passionate, results-focused current and former educators who have: an unyielding belief that every child can achieve at high levels, instructional expertise in a K-12 classroom, and exceptional leadership skills. Just seven percent of New Leaders applicants are selected; they serve in year-long residencies in urban public schools before receiving placement support as principals in their own schools. New Leaders principals and their schools then receive ongoing support from our staff and the broader New Leaders community as they work toward the goal of high academic achievement for every student.

NInety-three percent of our New Leaders have held school leadership positions, including 71% as principals and 22% as assistant principals. Such placement rates are considered extraordinarily high by professionals in the field.

New Leaders serve a range of school contexts, from district to charter, start-up to traditional, elementary to high school.  Roughly three-quarters serve traditional district schools, and one-quarter serve public charter schools.  New Leaders serve similar grade levels as our partner districts’ schools, with nearly half serving elementary or K-8 schools, 32% serving middle schools, and 23% serving high schools.

Teachers Compensated for Students’ Test Scores

USA Today reports that in eight states, some school districts are adopting experimental teacher-pay packages. Under the new pay packages, teacher compensation is determined by student performance; teachers are offered front-loaded higher salaries and bonuses if student tests scores improve or if teachers work in hard-to-staff schools. A research center launched at Vanderbilt University has found mostly promising, though limited, results to support this controversial model.

Residency Program Prepares Boston Teachers

As SMHC is completing case studies of leading edge districts and organizations focused on recruiting top teacher and principal talent into urban schools, teacher and principal residency programs are emerging as one important component of a multi-faceted set of strategies. The Boston Teacher Residency Program has been identified as one of the best such programs by many analysts.
 

Governor Pawlenty’s Teacher Transformation Act

Education Week reports that Minnesota Governor and SMHC Task Force Chair Tim Pawlenty is putting forth an ambitious teacher quality improvement plan. Under Gov. Pawlenty’s “Teacher Transformation Act,” all districts would be required to tie annual teacher pay increases to student performance; enforce tighter admission standards for teacher education programs; actively recruit mid-career professionals from
other fields to teach, especially in math and science; and introduce an intensive intervention program to address poor performance among 8th graders on reading and math state tests. The plan is supported by state Commissioner of Education Alice Seagren.

SMHC and administrators

Scholastic Administrator has some SMHC-relevant resources in their September/ October 2008 issue: 

The Outsourced District
In The Outsourced District, administrators needed more help for their district than could be found within the school systems boundaries. In response, they opened the door to new ideas. The result is a convergence of outside organizations partnering with the district to provide all sorts of things—highly qualified teachers, principal training, personalized education programs—that districts struggled to fulfill on their own. Call it a solution that reached beyond ordinary borders.  

This Month’s Profile
The proud head of Seattle schools, Maria Goodloe-Johnson, listens, reaches out, and handles the day-to-day crises with aplomb. Her activities are important to parents and educators who want to support city-wide programs to reach students.

Philly school staffing

In an article in today’s Philadephia Inquirer, SMHC acts as a resource for the 20th most widely circulated paper in the country, in one of our country’s largest urban school districts. The article discusses a common problem in many districts–that of staffing schools. Allan Odden, SMHC co-director, provides information on the comprehensive hiring strategies that all districts need to recruit the top talent necessary to bring up achievement levels.

Teacher compensation, 5th in a series

Today, SMHC releases the fifth paper in the series on teacher compensation.  Building on the first four installments, this paper articulates the importance of making changes to teacher compensation
as part of an overall strategic plan for improvement, rather than merely because it is the “reform of the moment.” The paper also estimates the costs of various teacher compensation changes and identifies various sources of funding for the new pay systems. The most intriguing conclusion is that the paper suggests the current teacher salary budget is the best and most stable funding source for new approaches to teacher salary schedules.  In addition, paper number five discusses options for implementing a new pay system and describes some of the potential challenges to making such changes.